March 12, 1993
Jim Heringer, Administrator
Corporate Industrial Hygiene and Safety
Harding Lawson Associates
7655 Redwood Boulevard
Post Office Box 578
Novato, California 94948
Dear Mr. Heringer:
This is in response to your inquiry of December
2, concerning the Occupational Safety
and
Health Administration's (OSHA) Hazardous
Waste Operations and Emergency Response
(HAZWOPER)
regulation, 29 CFR 1910.120.
Your questions concern clarification
on lapsed
refresher training. We will answer
your questions
in the order stated in your letter.
-
In cases where an individual has completed
a 40-hour or 24-hour health and safety training
for hazardous waste sites, when must a refresher
course be completed (e.g. if an individual
completes the 40-hour or 24-hour course in
March of one year, must the individual complete
a refresher by March of the following year
or may the individual complete the refresher
any time during the following calendar year
even up to December 31?)
OSHA's intent is that employees should complete
their refresher training within twelve months
of their initial training, although we do
understand that courses may be missed due
to unavoidable circumstances. The employee
who misses a refresher training should attend
the next available refresher course. Please
note that in some states operating their
own OSHA-approved state safety and health
program, refresher training must be completed
by the exact anniversary of the initial training.
As you may be aware, 23 states operate their
own state program.
-
In cases where an individual has not worked
in the hazardous waste industry for
a period
of time, how does the individual become
eligible
to return to work on a hazardous waste
site
(i.e., may an individual be qualified
to
return to hazardous waste work with
only
a refresher course or must the individual
take the 40-hour or 24-hour course
over)?
What are the time requirements to differentiate
these different cases: Example: Is
two years
between training too long? Is it okay
to
just complete a refresher if the individual
has been without training for seven
or more
years?
The time frame within which it would be necessary
to provide extensive retraining for
an individual
who has not worked in the hazardous
waste
industry for some time must be determined
on a case-by-case basis. Individual
retention
of information must be considered,
which
may be influenced by the duration of
prior
work in the hazardous waste industry.
Workers
who had very little work experience
before
leaving can not be expected to retain
their
skills to the extent a seasoned employee
would. Another important factor is
the applicability
of past course content and work experience
to the specific work activities and
safety
and health issues of hazardous waste
sites
to which the employee is to be assigned.
Employees need not retrain in those
training
elements for which they can demonstrate
competency.
In many cases, a two year absence from
hazardous
waste work would not necessitate repetition
of the course materials of the initial
24-hour
or 40-hour training, and refresher
training
by itself could be sufficient. However,
a
seven year absence would clearly indicate
a need for extensive retraining, with
particular
attention given to new technology.
In such
cases the employer may wish to consider
repeating
the initial training course. In some
cases,
for example an individual who has been
away
for three or four years, the employer
may
determine that, while repeating all
of the
training materials in the initial course
is not warranted, more than eight hours
of
training would be required to refresh
the
employee's knowledge and skills. In
all cases
employees new to a site would need
to be
given appropriate site-specific training
before site entry and be given supervised
field experience at the site to which
they
are assigned.
-
In cases where an individual has completed
the required 40- or 24-hour training
and
supervisory training, then either no
longer
works as a supervisor or leaves the
hazardous
waste industry for a period of time
and then
returns to become a supervisor, must
the
individual retake the supervisory training?
Retraining is not necessary where the employee
can demonstrate competency in the
required
training topics. Please note, however,
that
many of the training topics which
are to
be included in the supervisory training
are
site-specific in nature. Therefore,
regardless
of past supervisory training, a supervisor
new to a site would need training
to become
familiar with the following, as required
in paragraph (e)(4) of the standard:
"the employer's safety and health program
and the associated employee training
program,
personal protective equipment program,
spill
containment program, and health hazard
monitoring
procedure and techniques."
(Correction 07/27/00)
"the employer's safety and health program,
personal protective equipment program,
spill
containment program, and health hazard
monitoring
procedure and techniques."
-
In the case of individuals who after completing
40-hour or 24-hour training for whatever
reason do not complete the required
supervised
field work requirement, is there any
time
limit placed on these individuals to
complete
this required supervised field work
before
their training becomes outdated and
must
be retaken?
Please refer to the answer to question (b).
Supervised field experience is needed
to
reinforce knowledge and skills learned
during
training. Optimally, the individual
should
receive their supervised field experience
as soon as possible after training.
A case
by case determination should be made,
based
on an assessment of the individual's
competency
in the specified training topics.
We hope this information is helpful.
If you
have any further questions please contact
us at [(202) 693-2190].
Sincerely,
Roger A. Clark, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs
|
December 2, 1992
Facsimile 202-219-9187
Director of Compliance Programs
U. S. Department of Labor
OSHA
Francis Perkins Bldg., Room N3119
200 Constitution Ave. N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210
Dear Sir:
In the performance of our work on hazardous
waste sites and operations, questions
have
arisen about the allowable length of
time
between the completion of a 40-hour
or 24-hour
hazardous waste health and safety training
course and 8-hour refresher courses.
Specifically,
the questions are as follows:
-
In cases were an individual has completed
a 40-hour or 24-hour health and safety
training
for hazardous waste sites, when must
a refresher
course be completed (e.g. if an individual
completes the 40-hour or 24-hour course
in
March of one year, must the individual
complete
a refresher by March of the following
year
or may the individual complete the
refresher
any time during the following calendar
year
even up to December 31)?
-
In cases where an individual has not worked
in the hazardous waste industry for
a period
of time, how does the individual become
eligible
to return to work on a hazardous waste
site
(i.e. may an individual be qualified
to return
to hazardous waste work with only a
refresher
course or must the individual take
the 40-hour
or 24-hour course over)? What are the
time
requirements to differentiate these
different
cases? Example: Is two years between
training
too long? Is it okay to just complete
a refresher
if the individual has been without
training
for seven or more years?
-
In cases where an individual has completed
the required 40 or 24-hour training
and supervisory
training, then either no longer works
as
a supervisor or leaves the hazardous
waste
industry for a period of time and then
returns
to become a supervisor, must the individual
retake the supervisory training?
-
In the case of individuals who after completing
a 40-hour or 24-hour training for whatever
reason do not complete the required
supervised
field work requirement, is there any
time
limit placed on these individuals to
complete
this required supervised field work
before
their training becomes outdated and
must
be retaken?
I would appreciate receiving your comments
at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Jim Heringer, Administrator
Corporate Industrial Hygiene and Safety
|