|  | |
| Standards Interpretation and Compliance Letters Hazwoper Does Not Require Training For Employees Not Involved Or Exposed To Hazardous Waste Areas | |
|  | |
| 
 | |
| November 26, 1990 Mike Amen, CIH Riedel Environmental Technologies, Inc. 4611 N. Channel Avenue Portland, Oregon 97217 Dear Mr. Amen: This is in response to your letter concerning
      the Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
      Response Standard (29 CFR 1910.120). Please
      accept our apology for the delay in this
      reply. 
 Your other question concerns the training
      requirements for personnel whose duties
      are
      limited strictly to the support zone.
      The
      training requirements under 29 CFR
      1910.120(e)
      are not applicable for employees who
      meet
      the criteria set forth in the answer
      to the
      first question. Training requirements
      of
      other standards such as 29 CFR 1910.1200
      would be applicable. | |
|  | |
| TO: Pat Clark Director of Health/Safety Compliance OSHA Room N 3463 U.S. Department of Labor Washington, D.C. 26210 FROM: Mike Amen, CIH DATE: 21 September 1990 SUBJECT: Interpretation, 29 CFR 1910.120, Support Zone Training I am sending this letter of inquiry to you in the hopes of soliciting your help in resolving an issue which continues to confound and confuse us at the various Superfund/EPA cleanup sites we are contracted to cleanup. The question revolves around: 
 Within my capacity as Corporate Director
      of Health/Safety, my unsanctioned and unofficial
      interpretation has been that the Support
      Zone is, by definition, clean with no potential
      for exposure. This would seem to justify
      the rationale of bringing news media, delivery
      contractors and inspectors into this area
      without all the training and physical exam
      requirements. | |
|  | |
| More information on "Letters of Interpretations" can be found on OSHA's Website at www.osha.gov |